Saturday, September 26, 2009

Thanksgiving Should Come Early this Year

Rosalie mentioned the unrest some people have about the possibility that KG's injury could be severe enough so that he'll never be able to regain enough of his form to lead the Celtics to another championship.  It follows that those people would then ask, "Was it worth it to give up all those promising prospects for Ray and KG just for a one-and-done championship?"

Obviously, all good Celtics fans fervently wish KG the best and hope against hope that, sooner rather than later, he'll be back to full strength (or close enough to help propel the team to championship #18).  And, with only a few days to go before we'll probably have more definitive answers about his situation, I almost hate to write about this topic for fear of jinxing him.

But, just for the heck of it, what if the worst happens?  Let's not talk about injuries (the "jinx" factor); but let's assume that KG were suddenly called away to serve permanently as a missionary in the Australian Outback.  (Forget the implications about retirement and salary cap room, etc.; it's my fantasy.)  For one reason or another, assume he's now gone.  Following are my Top Ten reasons for not panicking and for giving thanks that I'm a Celtics fan at this time:

1. We'd still be left with a contender.  In fact, without adding a player, we'd still have 11 veterans available for 12 active roster slots (Perk, Paul, Rondo, Ray, Baby, Sheed, Eddie, Daniels, Williams, Tony, Scal), with at least two young guys (Giddens and Walker) busting their guts to get on that list and possibly another one (Hudson) knocking on the door.

2. Power forward is all of a sudden one of the deepest positions on the team, and Sheed, Baby, Williams and Scal would still be available to meet a need that Baby and Scal alone filled serviceably in last season's playoffs.

3. By not yet addressing the 15th roster spot, Danny has left himself the option of acquiring yet another player at the veteran's minimum.  He could be a PG, but he could also be a big man if needed—obviously not a great one, but at least another body in case of foul trouble, etc.  In fact, it could KG's unresolved situation, as much as PG questions, that has resulted in Danny's inaction to date.

4. Among Sheed, Baby, Williams, Scal, and possibly another guy, not one of them will provide the total package of ingredients represented by KG.  But I'm not convinced that a team this deep and versatile will require as many of those ingredients from one man as the Celtics needed in the past.

5. Doc has proven to be pretty good at adapting the team's style of play to the capabilities of his roster...with the success of his rag tag lineups in the playoffs being an especially good indication.  In the absence of KG, Doc and Thibs would be put to the "adaptation test."  But it could just be that Baby and/or Williams (both of whom I believe face challenges in discovering their optimal roles with this season's Celts) will prove to be difference-makers in one area or another of the game.  And one area of difference-making is all that's required of role players like them.  (More to come on that topic in another post.)

6. I don't know about anyone else, but I wouldn't have traded the chance to be at the 2008 Rolling Rally for anything.  That championship came out of left field, and I will forever be grateful for it.

7. I haven't seen anything from all those prospects who left Boston in the Ray and KG trades that would suggest the Celtics would be anywhere near the same shape with them on board rather than #20 and $5.  Guys like Al Jefferson and Gomes are growing into very dependable NBA players, but I'm not sensing that they exert the kinds of leadership and "NBA savoire faire" exhibited by the Three Amigos.

8. Think of the non-championship benefits that have accrued as a result of the trade.  The Celtics have returned to respectability.  They have become an attractive destination for valuable additions to the team.  Younger players such as Perk and Rondo have had an opportunity to mature within the "womb" of an experienced core.  Paul Pierce not only hung around but also was re-energized to the point of being able to put the Celts on his back when required.

9. Aside from the impact of Ray and KG on the other players and the "product" on the court, Doc, Danny and ownership have formed a highly competent hierarchy funded on mutual respect, trust and enthusiasm.  And the fan base has solidified and strengthened through the advent of "new blood."

10. Even if one forgets the Russell Years (which I know the fans of a certain Left Coast team, in their infinite and unending embarrassment, would dearly love to do), the Celtics have won 15% of all available championships from 1970 onward.  They're not the leaders in that respect, but they're not the Chicago Cubs in terms of championship hiatus either.  Heck, with 30 teams in the league, the purely mathematical "share" of championships should be 3% per team.  So, even adjusting for the varying numbers of team in the league over the years, we Celtics fans have probably enjoyed upwards of five times as much championship fun as should theoretically be our "share."  And, even in the 23 years since 1986, the Celtics have won 4% of the available championships.  That's better than zero, and it's also better than 80% of the teams in the league have accomplished over that span.

So I hope for the most favorable possible outcome regarding KG's injury.  Presumably he'll defer any Australian missionary work until he retires from the NBA due to old age.  But, come what may, I'm very grateful to be a Celtics fan, and I'm prepared to support them through thick and thin...no matter what.

In fact, I'm so grateful that, just yesterday, I went out for a bite of pre-Thanksgiving turkey.  But the sucker darted under some brush before I could catch it.  Bah-da-bing!

Best regards,

Sam

10 comments:

Unknown said...

One cannot underestimate the value of KG to the team. However, this team WITHOUT KG (and Leon) did pretty darn well in the playoffs.

We still have backup pg needs, but that's one role out of 12, and we have Eddie and Marquis to fill that role if they have to. That's depth.

If KG became a missionary in the Australian outback you better believe, whether they ever took up basketball or not, they'd be Fired Up!! Whether KG comes back 100% or not, he WILL be back in some capacity and that alone will help produce.

bob

Sam said...

Bob,

This team appears to be LOADED. Almost a surplus of assets. I hope that, if any of those assets is modified in some way, the other assets will fill in the gaps.

I firmly believe that, on this team, there are so many capabilities that roles will become more clearly defined than ever. And more narrowly defined roles will encourage greater focus and improvement among the younger guys in particular—especially who will almost surely see significant court time: Perk, Rondo, Baby and possibly Tony.

Improvement from four or five young guys could be akin to adding a very good player to the roster.

Sam

Rosalie said...

My feeling here is that the absence of KG has lulled fans into a sense of
disbelief. I feel that many have forgotten just how great a player KG is, and how much fun it is to watch this team when he is playing. Let's not jump the gun, I think the Celtics are playing a little "Patriot's" right now. We are not going to learn just where KG is in his recovery process right away. Information is very
sketchy at best. But, I do believe, that when the Celtics play their first home game, and Rondo let's go of the ball and KG
slams it home, the disbelievers will go crazy. Give him time, he will show us all that he has the heart of a champion.

Sam said...

Rosalie,

You're abaolutely right. And I certainly didn't mean to sound negative in my post. I personally accept the words of Doc, Danny and KG himself, suggesting that he'll be good to go. My main point was that, even if he weren't, there would be no reason to panic because this team is so deep. Which, for me, makes the whole thing pretty much of a non-issue at this point.

GO KG, AND GO CELTTICS.

Sam

beat said...

Sam, Rosie, and Bob

I just can't fathom that the KG injury is so bad that he won't play this season let alone when it starts. To see him walking around with NO trace of a limp or discomfort makes me wonder. Has anyone even seen him in crutches anytime since the "surgery"?

Sam, I know without him we can still be contenders, but to me thats the same as saying nice try. With KG near his best for 25 min a game we are virtually untouchable.

I too don't want to roll back the time machine and say what if or change anything. If by some cruel fate it's a one (championship) and done for a bit so be it. It sure beats a none and done.

Well we should get answers real soon about the "knee".

Warren

Sam said...

Beat,

I agree that the most important thing is how loaded this team will be WITH KG. Any alternative would be completely relative to the extreme position of strength this team now represents.

Sam

David14 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
David14 said...

Sam, sorry about the deletion, if that is displayed. I would prefer to post on your site with my real name. Never was one to like cover up user names. I was going to wait a bit to join your site, however I noticed you receive some commercial value when folks join. Therefore, I wanted to support your efforts. Truth be known, I love the Celtics, could never be objective about them, and hold the city of Boston and Bostonians in general on a pedastal. That goes for all my fellow Celtic fans who may not fully understand why some have to publish comments in restricted manmer. Some of us are bound by "professional responsibilities oaths" and are obligated avoid posting (publishing) statements in an adverserial and hostile manner. Therefore, BDC is a difficult forum for some.

Sam, I wish you the best of luck with your new venture. I also wish ALL my fellow Celtic fans continued good health, and an enjoyable, and highly successful season.

David

Sam said...

Many thanks David. Frankly, any commercial success will be a bonus (and probably a very tiny one at that). I just want an opportunity to use a selective thread approach to try to promote in-depth discussions so we can really learn from one another.

The "shotgun" effect of a message board definitely has its place. But it also leads to rapid-fire exchanges that sometimes get out of hand. I'd rather have fewer comments but more thoughtful ones, which we're already getting here.

One thing that should be spelled out is the difference between a post and a comment. I guess that only a board administrator can make a post, while anyone (including the administrator) can make a follow-up comments. My posts can be edited by me; but a comment cannot be edited. If a change is neceesary in a comment, it must be deleted and retyped.

I'm hoping people will want to make "guest posts" and will email them to me (SlipSamCelt@aol.com). I'll post them as written, with full credit to the authors.

I'm already finding it a relief to be able to say what I wish without fearing that every other word will somehow be censored or will create a major war. And that's not a dig at the Boston.com board, which I still support. It's just a different "animal."

I welcome ideas about possible discussion topics. Once preseason starts, day-after game analyses and debates will occupy some of the blog; but there will still be opportunities to address other matters.

Thanks a lot for your support,

Sam

genebock said...

Hope I can catch up with current events, Sam. Looking forward to renewed posts under more favorable conditions here.
gene